The recycling is a process that transforms the discarded garbage into a similar product to the initial or into a new product. The recycling has highly positive effect in the economic, social and ambient aspects. Its use as one of the tools of the integrated management of the solid residues promotes preservation of exhaustible raw material sources, increase of the useful life of the aterros sanitary, reduction of the costs of the final disposal of the garbage, economy of energy, generation of job and income, reduction of the expenses with the public health, ambient education, and for go there. As designers worried about the support of the planet, we create a project of reaproveitando of the lenses of eyeglasses that would be discarded in the nature. At the same time we will give a destination for what it would be garbage with degradation of long duration. Soon she is not being created substance demand extracted ambient cousin of the nature, as it is the case of the oil, non-renewable natural resources of where is manufactured resin CR-39.

The extration of the oil does not increase on account of this product. 5.1.RECICLAGEM AND Environment To recycle are one in the ways found for the man to preserve the environment, since to produce some product, she will not be necessary to remove the substance again cousin of the nature. The recycling of the aluminum can is one of the best examples of as the recycling helps in preservation of the environment. In accordance with TO RECYCLE BRAZIL (2009), the recycling of aluminum brings beneficial such as: Reduz the extration of the bauxite – for each a thousand kilos of aluminum that if it recycle, for example, approximately cares for five a thousand kilos of the rude ore; A recycling saves space in the sanitary aterros, therefore the cans do not arrive to go for the garbage; Estimula the ambient conscience of the population and the companies, who had started to have a responsible behavior in relation to the environment.

The Co2 is not toxic and is of course present in the atmosphere? but it is also a gas greenhouse (GH is its acronym in English) e, therefore a potential cause of antropognico global heating (AGW in English). Two sources how much to the global heating, one followed by the majority, of that the humanity must review its concepts and its operations immediately if she wants a level of better quality, and the American, Russian source exist and of other desenvolvimentistas small farms, that believe that the global heating independe of the activity human being. This article was a challenge, for you, that it reads in them, and for we, therefore were written contrarily to our thought, to show the importance of the choice of the monograph subject, that always must be made from what you if feel more to the will to choose, does not stop outrem pleasing it. The verbal arguments and the scientific summaries ' ' amicus curiae' ' , the favor and against, had never treated the basic subject: Is the Co2 the root cause of the current heating? Between who it supported position of the plaintiff if includes two Prizes Nobel in chemistry? although that this tactics can have a countyer-productive effect when the assistants of the magistrate discover that the two had demonstrated little ability in discipline excellent to the subject. The absence of a good science results evident in the searched carefully legal dispute regarding the situation. To support its affirmation of that the antropognico global heating will injure the Massachusetts, its associate general promoter, James Milkey, invoked the growth of the level of the sea and the loss of coastal lands, being based on a previous deposition but suggesting the court not to inquire on its mritos. All the available information sample that the levels of the sea in a global scope if had raised 400 feet since the peak of the age of more recent ice has 18,000 years. .